data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/000a8/000a876d537af605e1e8442bf3c2d6653d780563" alt=""
I have to say that I never had a professor like Lawrence Wetherhold (great pretentious name) during the process of getting my bachelors in English Literature. And thank God. Wetherhold (Dennis Quaid in wonderfully smug performance) is one of those professors that are so self-involved he can’t even remember student’s names who have been in his class consecutive terms. First time director Noam Murro and first time writer Mark Poirier understand that when dealing with pretension caricature has a tendency to mutate your comedic intentions; both Murro and Poirier sidestep the pitfalls of movies like this and instead of hitting me over the head with the obviousness of their satire, they reminded me more of the subdued, cerebral satire of academia found in films like Sideways and The Squid and the Whale. Smart People is not a perfect movie, but it has its moments and deserves mention next to the wittiest of intellectually dysfunctional family satires.
Lawrence is having trouble getting a book about postmodern something or other published, and his dreadful, dreary existence is alleviated by the appearance of his adopted brother Chuck’s (the always wonderful and breath-of-fresh-air Thomas Haden Church) surprise visit. Lawrence doesn’t want his life to change, though, and it isn’t until a stupid attempt to get his car from an impound lot goes awry resulting in a concussion that he has to rely on Chuck to chauffeur him around for 6 weeks. While at the hospital Lawrence is smitten with his doctor, Janet (Sarah Jessica Parker), a former student of his – of course he doesn’t realize that until he’s told by the neurologist.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ec02/4ec022e4c0eb42aa9ec7e64dea062510d4c64b9e" alt=""
Vanessa obviously cares for her dad as she plays house mom in between school and young Republican meetings; she cooks and cleans and does laundry because she feel she has to pick up the slack left by her mothers death. However, with Chuck’s arrival things begin to change as the two share a joint, watch Spanish soap opera, and go to a bar to celebrate her getting into Stanford. It appears that Vanessa’s icy exterior is beginning to thaw, but then something happens at the bar with her and Chuck that changes things.
Naturally a relationship blossoms between Lawrence and Janet, but it doesn’t go in the directions you think it will at first. Lawrence isn’t a nice person, and I like the way that Murro just shows Janet coming over for Christmas dinner after having second thoughts about sleeping with Lawrence instead of showing us the cliché scene where they argue about their problems. However, this particular storyline is the most banal thing about Smart People, and it takes up a good chuck of the story. There’s absolutely zero chemistry between Quaid and Parker and I felt like it was trying to do the Sideways thing where you have an intelligent outsider go out of his realm to win over a smart and sexy woman that is out of his league.
There’s a lot of stuff to admire here: the way Murro lets the intelligence of his characters act as both their best quality and what makes them so unappealing. He understands that the wacky adopted uncle character could have sunk the movie, and instead with the aide of Church, makes Chuck into the most likable and memorable character of the movie (he’s also in some way the smartest), instead of being an annoying, loud-mouthed blowhard like so many of his character types are.
Which brings me to perhaps Murro’s greatest achievement: the first time director handles the subplot of Lawrence’s deceased wife with a subdued clarity. There aren’t false moments or cheesy epiphanies, here; no, instead what we get are subtle clues as to what probably happened to Lawrence’s wife, and Murro installs a nice little motif throughout the film that leads us to this assumption as we see throughout various scenes that Lawrence refuses to ride in the passenger seat of a car because he gets nauseous.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f89d/9f89da842b3c22cdab68c9af2aa888a7785bca1f" alt=""
Smart People could have easily devolved into a ridiculous parody; instead it has a keen eye and sharp perspective on how the aesthete operates. Church provides a few laugh out loud moments, but the bulk of the humor is cerebral -- where 30 minutes after the fact, still thinking about the movie, you laugh. One of those moments is where Lawrence is going to change a grade to a ten year old paper that Janet’s written (this coming after a botched first date where all he did was talk about how smart he was), and in a hilarious moment where convention tells us he will change from a C to an A to show the err of his ways, deliver it to her at her work and win her back…he changes it from a C to a B-.
The film definitely has some flaws (like the whole Janet character, even though it leads to some semi-touching moments of realization for Lawrence, and some unnecessary added punch lines to scenes that should have remained subtle), but overall I think it succeeds at poking fun at the pedantic, know-it-all types who take themselves waaaay too seriously. Murro is saying that it’s okay to be smart, in fact it’s good (and encouraged) to be smart (you have to be in order to understand some of the jokes in this film), but you definitely need some balance in your life. It’s the appropriate message for a film that is really hard on its main character. I liked Smart People, a lot; at only 93 minutes it hardly felt like it robbed me of my time, and even if I can’t totally buy that ending, it’s forgivable because it’s an impressive debut for this writer and director who show an amazing amount of restraint and comedic instinct for first time filmmakers. I'm excited to see what comes from their next collaboration which is due out in 2010.
No comments:
Post a Comment